None of what "politics" speech was not. And he Golovatsky and support his nascent Ruthenian elite intellectuals (in large part, by the way, the Uniate clergy), remaining loyal subjects of the Habsburgs and the faithful flock of the Vatican, sought only to solve cultural issues. However, it should be recognized: the natural course of reasoning inevitably led them to a very definite conclusion that, in turn, led to the horror of the Polish community. In Vienna Loads of plaintive petitions "Russophilism", "obedinitelstve" and other deadly sins. Poles, previously very hairy, and now scattered in the statements of a complete loyalty and willingness to "enjoy peace forever blessed under the scepter of Caesar," which, of course, was met at Schonbrunn with full sympathy. The Austrian authorities were quite satisfied with the "anti-Polish counterbalance" in the face of Rusyns, but not going to encourage the development on its territory sympathy for the potential enemy, also claiming to be the unifier of all the Slavic world. So the consensus was reached, and Austria has made a number of steps to strengthen Polish influence in both Galicia, abandoning the idea of ??partition. However, on the Vienna and Vienna it was not to act by brute force. The stake was made on a split inside the Ruthenian national movement, especially because there are certain prerequisites.